data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ee15/9ee15d12b6de450f068c8bd6b3bec7d01c6534a1" alt=""
The traditional tribal landowners generated significant negative value within the collaboration through their consistent and visible opposition to its activities.
'Landowners' Objections' false-value partners can be actual, as per the above example, or they can be a metaphor for something else, e.g., possessing specialist knowledge and expertise, or 'owning the moral high ground'. They tend to emerge in situations where there are strong vested interests and a bias towards political manoeuvring and power plays.
It is not always wise to avoid 'Landowners' Objections' false-value partners. If they have power and influence within the environment surrounding a collaboration it is best to invite them to become partners and tolerate the negative value they contribute. Then, informal ties and relationships can gradually be created that will enable a collaboration to recognise and exploit changes of stance or situation potentially favourable to its aims. Also, keeping this type of partner within the collaboration tent, rather than allowing it to roam freely and mark off its own territory, enhances a collaboration's ability to anticipate and manage the damage it can cause.
From Sleeping with the Enemy - Achieving Collaborative Success
For more details click here.
To see the full post click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment